Ray Hadley 'censorship' spat continues | radioinfo

Ray Hadley 'censorship' spat continues

Thursday 12 October, 2017

SCA has issued an extended statement relating to ongoing disruptions to Ray Hadley's Triple M broadcast about a local court case in Orange: 

'On several occasions this week as a result of legal advice SCA has decided not to broadcast parts of the program.  These decisions were based solely on legal advice and were not influenced by any commercial considerations, including the fact that West Orange Motors has a commercial relationship with SCA. Attempts to frame this issue as one of censorship and free speech are misleading.

'On Monday 11 October the broadcast of the program contained discussion of a case currently before the Orange Local Court in which a young man has been charged with dangerous driving causing the death of an elderly man. The incident occurred whilst the man was at work test-driving a truck owned by his employer – West Orange Motors.

'While SCA appreciates the significance and the impact on the Orange community of this case, SCA was concerned that the material broadcast was potentially in breach of Australian contempt of court and defamation laws.'

The statement, issued by SCA's Head of Regulatory Affairs and Corporate Communications, Creina Chapman, goes on to assert that the media group's actions are informed by its legal responsibilities:

'In relation to contempt, media organisations in Australia are required to exercise extreme care when reporting on stories which are currently before the court.  The law states that once a person has been charged with an offence, reporting is limited to the bare facts of the case and what is said and heard in open court.  This is to ensure that the accused has a fair trial; that the merits of the case are not debated in the public arena during the trial; and that witnesses and jurors do not come to the trial with a preconceived notion about guilt or innocence.'

As reported yesterday by radioinfo, while Hadley believes Triple M is 'trying to protect its advertiser', SCA maintains it is a legal issue. 

'In SCA's view Monday's segment contained material which went beyond the parameters of legal court reporting of a trial. Given the live nature of the program and the host's public opinion that he does not consider his comments to be of concern, since Monday, SCA has declined to air any part of the show that refers to the case because of the risk that further problematic material may be aired.

'Furthermore, given the risk of further defamatory statements being made, SCA has extended the decision not to broadcast parts of the program relating to the case to all of its stations that air the program.' 

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Log InYou must be logged in to post comments.
radioinfo ABN: 87 004 005 109  P O Box 6430 North Ryde NSW 2113 Australia.  T: 0413 790 666 02 9888 5705  |  All content © 2012. All Rights Reserved.